Chlamydia
pneumoniae bacteria |
| Click to view other
interesting articles about Chlamydia pneumoniae possibly links to heart
disease and multiple sclerosis (MS) |

By Nancy Humphrey
Say Chlamydia
pneumoniae and before you get to pneumoniae most people think of
a sexually transmitted disease.
"As soon as people hear the name Chlamydia their ears shut
down," said Dr. Charles W. Stratton, associate professor of
Pathology. "They either don't hear or don't understand the
second part - pneumoniae. They think of Chlamydia trachomatis, a
common cause of sexually transmitted diseases. c is the one that's
not fun to catch."
The Chlamydia pneumoniae (C. pneumoniae) organism, first described
in 1988, is not the sexually-transmitted type. It is an airborne
organism that you get from breathing after a person carrying the
organism has coughed.
"They float around as droplet nuclei, similar to TB. People
cough and up come these infectious bodies. They float around a room.
You breathe. In they come and now you've got your own."
It's how they work inside the body that Stratton, Dr. William M.
Mitchell, professor of Pathology, and colleagues have been looking
at for the past five years.
The study of the organism has intensified as Stratton's colleagues
at Vanderbilt and other medical centers around the country, including
Johns Hopkins and The Mayo Clinic, look at the role of Chlamydia
in diseases such as Multiple Sclerosis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Pyoderma
gangrenosum, Coronary Artery Disease and Interstitial Cystitis.
Stratton said that Chlamydia is sneaky. When viruses invade a cell,
if they are active, they integrate in the human DNA and basically
take over the cell.
"They tell the cell, 'Ok, today, we're going to do nothing
but make viruses and the cell often dies in this process,"
Stratton said.Chlamydia works in a different way. First, when you
breathe in Chlamydia, it can infect the ciliated cells, the cells
lining the airways. Ciliated cells are like an escalator that moves
mucus along. Chlamydia can paralyze the ciliated cells because it
steals their energy. So the host has a nasty respiratory infection.
When you have an active infection of any kind, the body has an
immune response to it. Part of the immune response is that monocytes
and macrophages try to engulf the pathogen and kill it.
But they can't always kill Chlamydia. Instead, they disseminate
the organism to peripheral blood mononuclear cells and the organism
can silently infect other cells in the body. "With these cryptic
infections, you don't have symptoms. And because Chlamydia isn't
really a virus, when it's causing a cryptic infection, it's metabolizing.
It's eating, drinking, singing and dancing. It's alive."
Since Chlamydia can't make its own energy, it has to steal energy
from the human cell. This means the chlamydia-infected cell doesn't
work well. "If Chlamydia is actively metabolizing in a cell,
it's up to no good. It's stealing energy. I can't picture anything
good coming from chlamydia being in a human cell."
Chlamydia also likes to infect endothelial cells, the cells that
line blood vessels. When there's inflammation in the body, there
often is angiogenesis, meaning new blood cells are formed. And Chlamydia
is drawn to those cells. So if Chlamydia is in the peripheral blood
mononuclear cells and there's an inflammation in the host's body,
you're "unlucky," Stratton said. Any secondary inflammatory
process could become secondarily infected by Chlamydia no matter
what the source of the inflammation, Stratton said.
"Now you've got a chronic problem," Stratton said. "Now
you've got a major chronic infection in the tissue, whether it's
the brain (MS) or in the joints (Rheumatoid Arthritis).
"If you have inflammation, a spider bite, a viral joint infection,
viral meningitis or encephalitis, it doesn't matter what it is,
if a Chlamydia-infected cells happens to end up in that inflamed
area, you may have just started yourself a Chlamydia farm."
Stratton said this doesn't necessarily mean that Chlamydia causes
the disease, but it may play heavily into how the disease progresses.
There may be many causes of MS, Rheumatoid Arthritis or other diseases
in which Chlamydia is believed to play a role.
"One thought is that Chlamydia is not the cause of anything
other than pneumonia but once it causes a lung infection and gets
into your peripheral blood mononuclear cells, it's available to
cause secondary infections in other tissues if the infected white
cells happen to go to those tissues.
"It may be that MS is an infection of the brain that is caused
by viruses, and most people who get that viral infection of the
brain have a headache for a week, then get better. If you happen
to have Chlamydia, however, you may go on and have a chronic illness.
Scanned in from "The Economist -
21st March 1998
ATLANTA
Evidence is accumulating that many chronic ailments, including one
that kills, are caused by bacteria.
Bugged by disease.
Evidence is accumulating that many chronic ailments, including one
that kills, are caused by bacteria. MOST people, in
the West at least, probably think of a bacterial infection as something
that is over with quickly. You catch it, you are treated, you get
better—or else you die. There are exceptions, of course.
Leprosy brings lingering misery, and tuberculosis can last for
years. In general, though, bacterial diseases appear to be short
sharp shocks that can be dealt with by a highly tuned immune system,
perhaps backed up with a dose of antibiotics.
It may come as a surprise, therefore, that asthma, arthritis, hardening
of the arteries and a number of other diseases which sometimes nag
on for as long as a person lives may also be the result of bacterial
infections. Exploring the role that bacteria play in these ailments
is a new topic in medicine. That is why, although the diseases themselves
are hardly novel, the recent International Conference on Emerging
Infectious Diseases, held in Atlanta by America’s Centres for Disease
Control ( CDC ), devoted a session to them.
Now you see it...
The session’s principal speaker was Gail Cassell, who works at Eli
Lilly’s laboratory in Indianapolis on a group of bugs known as the
Mycoplasmas. (Much of CDC ’s own effort in the field is co-ordinated
by Siobhan O’Connor.) Dr Cassell explained how the field had arisen,
some of the difficulties and some recent findings.
The first chronic complaint found to have an unexpected bacterial
cause was stomach ulceration. The evidence that ulcers are triggered
by a bug called Helicobacter pylori had been accumulating since
the 1970s. America’s medical establishment (ie, the National Institutes
of Health) officially accepted the idea in 1994. This encouraged
others who were looking for hitherto-unsuspected connections between
infections and disease.
Meanwhile, a number of new biochemical tools capable of identifying
so-called “fastidious” bacteria—bugs that are difficult to extract
from infected tissue and grow in cultures for identification—were
being developed to aid the search. Bacterial genes can now be detected
in infected tissues by using in situhybridisation, in which small
DNA “probes” attached to fluorescent molecules stick to the relevant
genes, or with advanced versions of PCR (the polymerase chain reaction,
which allows small numbers of DNA molecules to be multiplied into
quantities that can be analysed).
Bacterial proteins, too, can be identified and analysed in infected
tissue by combining new techniques for the production of antibodies
with the expanding science of immunocytochemistry (which looks at
the reactions to those antibodies of individual components of cells).
The days when an infection could be identified only by growing a
culture in a Petri dish are past.
Helicobacter’s activities seem, so far, to be confined to the stomach
(though the bacterium has now been implicated in cancer there, as
well as in its ulcers). A number of other bacterial suspects appear,
however, to have broader effects. Conversely, similar symptoms can
be produced by a variety of organisms.
For example, four different sorts of food-borne bug—Salmonella,
Shigella, Campylobacter and Yersinia—can cause reactive arthritis,
a painful inflammation of the joints that may last months or even
years. And the same bacteria also cause Reiter’s syndrome, a disease
whose victims suffer not only inflamed joints, but also inflammation
of the eyes and the urinary tract.
Reactive arthritis is not, however, caused only by what you eat.
It can also result from other pleasures. It may be provoked by infection
with Chlamydia trachomatis, a sexually transmitted denizen of the
genital tract, and Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma fermentans,
two other inhabitants of the genitals. Breathing can be hazardous
too. Mycoplasma pneumoniae, a cause of pneumonia, as its name suggests,
is also implicated in reactive arthritis. And arthritis of a somewhat
different sort sometimes follows Lyme disease, an infection caused
by Borrelia burgdorferi which is passed on by tick bites. Chlamydia
trachomatis also causes blindness, while its cousin,
Chlamydia pneumoniae, is implicated in asthma. Mycoplasma
pneumoniae also appears to be involved in asthma. But perhaps the
most worrying of all these findings is the suspected link between
Chlamydia pneumoniae and atherosclerosis (hardening of the arteries).
Over the past few years, research done in Finland, Italy, Britain,
Argentina and America has confirmed that this bacterium likes to
inhabit the fatty “plaques” which accumulate on the insides of the
blood-vessel walls when arteries harden. One inference is that the
bacteria may not merely be living in the plaques, but creating them.
There is a risk to this kind of reasoning, of course. The studies
done so far clearly show a greater risk that someone will suffer
a heart attack if antibodies to Chlamydia are present in his blood
stream (indicating that the immune system is reacting to the bacterium’s
presence), or when its DNA is found in his clogged arteries (it
is definitely in the “fastidious” category when growing in arterial
plaques, and has only rarely been cultured from them). But this
does not prove Chlamydia is causing heart disease. It could simply
be that the bugs like to live in plaques, but that those plaques
were caused in the first place by something completely different.
And even the strongest proponents of the idea that atherosclerosis
is an infection do not claim Chlamydia is a sufficient cause by
itself; diet and genes are also involved.
But there are at least two reasons to believe that correlation,
in this case, reflects causation. First, using antibiotics to treat
an atherosclerotic patient who has had one heart attack reduces
the risk of his suffering a second. (Rheumatoid arthritis, the most
common arthritic variety, also responds to antibiotics in some patients,
leading researchers to suspect that it, too, may sometimes be provoked
by bacteria.) Second, research has come up with the glimmer of a
mechanism.
A recent experiment by Robert Molestina at the University of Louisville,
in Kentucky, has shown that infecting endothelial cells taken from
the walls of coronary arteries with Chlamydia stimulates the production
of molecules called chemokines. That is not surprising, since the
role of chemokines is to attract disease-fighting white blood cells
called neutrophils and monocytes to the blood-vessel walls. Once
there, however, these blood cells invade the endothelium, causing
it to become inflamed.
Such inflammation is, in fact, a normal response to bacterial infection.
The curious question is why the inflammation would become chronic
in atherosclerosis, when in the case of most infections it is transient.
The most likely explanations are that the immune system is unable
to clear the infection completely or that the site is peculiarly
susceptible to reinfection, causing more damage each time. The bacteria,
in other words, keep proliferating and the white cells keep coming.
But whatever the cause, since another effect of inflammation is
to attract platelets (fragments of blood cells that cause clots
to form) to the area, the creation of a clot, with the attendant
risk of a heart attack or stroke, is a common consequence of this
continual inflammation.
Solve the problem of chronic inflammation, then, and a cure for
atherosclerosis may come closer. But chronic inflammation is not
restricted to the arterial walls. It appears to be the linking factor
of many of these diseases. Arthritis is inflammation of the joints.
Crohn’s disease (also suspected of being caused by bacteria) is
an inflammation of the bowel. Ulcers are inflammations of the stomach.
And so on.
Ironically, this common feature makes testing whether a particular
disease is bacterial more difficult. Applying antibiotics, as has
been done for atherosclerosis and arthritis, is the obvious experiment.
But many antibiotics are also anti-inflammatories, which makes the
results ambiguous.
If, nevertheless, a wide range of diseases now put down to the general
process of ageing do turn out to be infections, a new field of treatment
will open. Over the past few years, drug companies have been reluctant
to invest in new antibiotics. Soon they may change their minds.
Vaccines against germs which have been regarded as unworthy of attention
might also be developed if such germs are shown to cause serious
diseases. In future, therefore, it may be possible to pop a pill
or have a shot to keep you both free of heart disease and lithe
of limb.
|
|

All information on this website is copyright ©
2003. You have permission to copy portions of it for personal use.
|
|